God, she is cute in the picture. She looks younger with that style. I love how different this character is from Hermione. I always thought Emma would fit in a sofia coppola's film. I can't wait to see it, I so happy to see her in this kind of movie, it's perfect.
She's, as always, magnificent, and it's great to see her "in character" and just oozing that tough, in-your-face, demanding personality... But I'm glad all those tats are temps! Defiling Emma's amazing skin like that would be like graffiti on the Sistene Chapel Ceiling.
I think Emma really ravished the role and the chance to be a snotty bad ass. She's had to fit this mold of the "good girl" all of her life. I know in Perks, her Sam character does drugs and whatnot, but Sam is a genuinely good, kind hearted person.Here, Emma got to be the girl that takes everything for granted, is attention and fame seeking, doesn't give a shit about other people, breaks into celebrities' houses....a little known reality star princess.
Even though Emma is so different from the real Alexis, I can see her doing a fabulous job in this role. I'm sure it gave her the opportunity to be the diva she is always so careful to not be. I would KILL this role if I was her. I really have high expectations of her in this film. From this picture, it looks like she is on her way to an appropriate embodiment of the character.
totally loving the long hair now. someday Emma's hair will grow back and she will have those soft wavy locks...she looks so young here. she lost some weight for this movie but eventually will have the ever healthy looking miss watson again:)))
She looks tough with an attitude but tiny, even vulnerable. I think Emma is beginning with her surprises. I'd like to know what more she has up her sleeves. Some years ago I remember reading where she supposedly said less is more. We get he tidbits in bits but that makes all the more interesting.
I agree with xyza, she may have lost a little weight for the role but to me she looks the same in this pic as she did during Perks last year. At no point (to me that is) has she ever looked unhealthy and there is nothing wrong with small fluxuations in weight gain or loss.
oh my god guys.. she looks so skinny lately, she must have lost at least 15lbs seriously.. i mean, of course, it looks fabulous, but come on really? let's hope she doesn't get lost in losing weight...
15 lbs? I really hope you're just being sarcastic b/c of all of the weight-loss comments. Emma couldn't have been more than 110 lbs at any time this past year. If she'd have lost 15lbs, she'd be as thin as an anorexic.
On someone of her size and weight, a 5 lb weight loss would be/even look like a drastic change.
Emma looks exactly the same here as she's looked these past 2 years. I really think the apparent look of weight loss is due to the fact that she's wearing skimpy clothes. She's not covered up in dresses, or jackets that make her look heavier.
Emma face lost like 2 lbs.But,she looks fine.The clothes and the hair make are too big on her.S'e 5'6" tall and weighs like 110...if she lost 15 lbs.,she would be a stik which clearly,she isn't....She'll eat anything at anytime.i bet you if she gained like 100 lbs,she would still be beautiful...She just has a nice face & of course,a nice heart....LOVE HER
Emma's 5'3 1/2 not 5'6. A guy that did her costumes for HP 5 wrote it on celebrity height but his comment got ereased after. Her shoe size is 6 1/2 or 7. At that time she was about 110 pounds.
15 lbs would put her in the category of an Olson twin and being able to play the xylaphone on her ribs, haha! I think it's just the photo because her body looked normal during Coachella and Tribeca.
If she is only 5'2, then daniel radcliffe must be about 4'11 or 5'0 for she is taller than he is. He is very short for a man. In the long run, I can't imagine him getting many roles as a leading man. He is just too short- to bad for he has a great face..Emma's Imdb says 5'5.
I'm glad when this bling ring stint is over. I just hope this film doesn't an any way mollify these little crooks as victim of fashion tyranny in the media or bad role-models through the media. These little stinkers were crooks. Now if she would have played bonnie in bonnie and clyde. There people have reasons for getting bent badly.(sigh) Emma is always beautiful, but I wish for some more Perks updates.
I'm willing to bet Emma is a bit shorter/same height as Daniel. Sure at the final Potter premieres last year she was taller but her heels were at least 3 1/2-4 inches high. Also I saw video of her taking her heels off once she entered the building at the NYC premiere she seemed to "shrink" a lot the second they came off. While I don't think she's 5'0 tiny I don't think she's 5'6 without heels either.
Daniel probably isn't 5'5" either, tbh. Emma seems really small, heightwise, when she isn't n heels. Probably around 5'3"? If anyone has met her in person, they'd know for sure.
Lol Dan Radcliffe is shorter than you think. He's 5'4 and no, Emma is not taller than him. My friend who's 5'4 saw her and said she was shorter than her. So yeah she's prolly around 5'2 to 5'4 max. And celebrities often lie about ther height (they add an inch or two).
5'2" would also be way too short for modeling. I would say Emma is between 5'5" and 5'6". She is taller than Dan even with flats and Dan on tip toes. No offense. I like Dan, but he is a handsom little man.
Good for her for getting movie roles, but I think she harped on the whole school thing a tad too much. I get it was a PR move, but no one would have judged her if she just said she wanted to do movies, model, do fashion, be famous, etc if she started it from the beginning after HP ended. I read that even though she dropped out again, she's still right on track with credits. How is this possible? Anyone know? Also, longer hair def looks better. They could have gotten a more realistic weave, though haha. Pretty girl regardless. Yes, she lost weight, but her weight fluctuates with what Hollywood things she's doing, just like most actresses.
To Daniel, Emma got Advanced Placement credits for her perfect A-Levels. (She explained that once.) I would also continue to say, that when she took that summer Shakespeare course at RADA, she most likely got Drama credit for that summer. The way it usually goes that with AP credits and with RADA, she would go into college with at least 9 to 12 credits (most likely 12) 12 to 15 credits is considered a semester load. So in the 1st. Semester she most likely took 15 to 18 hours for the 1st semester and about 15 credits the 2nd semester, 15 credit the 3rd semester. So after the 3rd semester she most likely had about 60 credits. If Emma knew that she would possibly had to interupt her education, she probably took as many credits as possible during her freshman year when she wasn't under so much pressured. That would have given her a Junior standing up to her Oxford time. At Oxford she most likely collected some credit during the first two terms. Now she interupted Trinity term, which is actually independent study for research. The question is she doing any research or has she pushed the last term to next year. I doubt she has senior standing if she doesn't do her research during Trinity. I think the JYA only counts if you complete all the terms, but there I have heard different, for there are students who only study abroad for a semester until the Christmas break and their credits count. I guess it is a matter how Brown chooses to evaluate what she has actually researched and what was evaluated from professors during her uni time. But she definately collected AP credtis from her A-levels, and I bet from RADA also. Students from USA study there for a year, and those credits are transferable. She did that course after A-Levels so it would be considered a college level course. And take it- she studied Shakespeare Text and performance at RADA.
At most Ivy League colleges, credit only counts towards courses that are applicable to ones major. This was the case at Yale, although Brown may be far more lenient. So if Emma is majoring in English (?) not all her A levels will count, therefore she should not, legally, be a semester ahead.
I guess that is clear. But would RADA count since it was a Shakespeare course. I have read that she is majoring in Drama (Literature) and History at Brown and did an English Literature stint at OXford. But since you can create your own major at brown itis most likely combined according to interest of study. She did do A-Levels (AP) in history and English.
41 comments:
Nicki's got some attitude lol, and a lot more tattoos than we thought. Only problem is that we now have to wait a year for this film to come out.
Emma you just look beautiful even if you are wearing the most chaviest clothing have ever seen!
there are those pink pjs under her coat.
she is sooo skinny!!! O.O btw did anyone see that she wrote TWITTERERS instead of TWITTERS xD i checked what's correct :D
Hence the "" ;p I personally say tweeters.
I still think she looks better with long hair. She looks so youthful and pretty here.
The correct word is twitters? I always wrote twitterers or tweeters hehe :P. Emma looks like she's got a hell of a attitude on this pic!
God, she is cute in the picture. She looks younger with that style. I love how different this character is from Hermione. I always thought Emma would fit in a sofia coppola's film. I can't wait to see it, I so happy to see her in this kind of movie, it's perfect.
She's, as always, magnificent, and it's great to see her "in character" and just oozing that tough, in-your-face, demanding personality... But I'm glad all those tats are temps! Defiling Emma's amazing skin like that would be like graffiti on the Sistene Chapel Ceiling.
I think Emma really ravished the role and the chance to be a snotty bad ass. She's had to fit this mold of the "good girl" all of her life. I know in Perks, her Sam character does drugs and whatnot, but Sam is a genuinely good, kind hearted person.Here, Emma got to be the girl that takes everything for granted, is attention and fame seeking, doesn't give a shit about other people, breaks into celebrities' houses....a little known reality star princess.
Even though Emma is so different from the real Alexis, I can see her doing a fabulous job in this role. I'm sure it gave her the opportunity to be the diva she is always so careful to not be. I would KILL this role if I was her. I really have high expectations of her in this film. From this picture, it looks like she is on her way to an appropriate embodiment of the character.
i am going to chase this girl until i met her.i have to meet her.it's my goal in life.Once i complete that,i will be happy.i think....
totally loving the long hair now. someday Emma's hair will grow back and she will have those soft wavy locks...she looks so young here. she lost some weight for this movie but eventually will have the ever healthy looking miss watson again:)))
I like the hair on Emma. And she really looks edgy because of the tattoos.
Love these tweets! Very cute! But I'm ready for the PERKS NEWS
This is almost the exact same hairstyle that she had when did an interview/photoshoot for Tatler Magazine in 2007 (promoting OotP.)
She looks so cool here. I hope she tweets a lot more, they're so fun!
She looks tough with an attitude but tiny, even vulnerable. I think Emma is beginning with her surprises. I'd like to know what more she has up her sleeves. Some years ago I remember reading where she supposedly said less is more. We get he tidbits in bits but that makes all the more interesting.
I agree with xyza, she may have lost a little weight for the role but to me she looks the same in this pic as she did during Perks last year. At no point (to me that is) has she ever looked unhealthy and there is nothing wrong with small fluxuations in weight gain or loss.
oh my god guys.. she looks so skinny lately, she must have lost at least 15lbs seriously.. i mean, of course, it looks fabulous, but come on really? let's hope she doesn't get lost in losing weight...
15 lbs? I really hope you're just being sarcastic b/c of all of the weight-loss comments. Emma couldn't have been more than 110 lbs at any time this past year. If she'd have lost 15lbs, she'd be as thin as an anorexic.
On someone of her size and weight, a 5 lb weight loss would be/even look like a drastic change.
Emma looks exactly the same here as she's looked these past 2 years. I really think the apparent look of weight loss is due to the fact that she's wearing skimpy clothes. She's not covered up in dresses, or jackets that make her look heavier.
Emma face lost like 2 lbs.But,she looks fine.The clothes and the hair make are too big on her.S'e 5'6" tall and weighs like 110...if she lost 15 lbs.,she would be a stik which clearly,she isn't....She'll eat anything at anytime.i bet you if she gained like 100 lbs,she would still be beautiful...She just has a nice face & of course,a nice heart....LOVE HER
Emma's 5'3 1/2 not 5'6. A guy that did her costumes for HP 5 wrote it on celebrity height but his comment got ereased after. Her shoe size is 6 1/2 or 7. At that time she was about 110 pounds.
15 lbs would put her in the category of an Olson twin and being able to play the xylaphone on her ribs, haha! I think it's just the photo because her body looked normal during Coachella and Tribeca.
^ Oh, she isn't 5'6". I saw her around Islington when I lived there, she's really tiny, like 5'2" or 5'3".
She looks so tiny in these tweets- like the body of a child but the face of a slightly mean-browed woman.
If she is only 5'2, then daniel radcliffe must be about 4'11 or 5'0 for she is taller than he is. He is very short for a man. In the long run, I can't imagine him getting many roles as a leading man. He is just too short- to bad for he has a great face..Emma's Imdb says 5'5.
I'm glad when this bling ring stint is over. I just hope this film doesn't an any way mollify these little crooks as victim of fashion tyranny in the media or bad role-models through the media. These little stinkers were crooks. Now if she would have played bonnie in bonnie and clyde. There people have reasons for getting bent badly.(sigh) Emma is always beautiful, but I wish for some more Perks updates.
Sorry to burst your bubble,but Daniel Radcliffe is 5'5" tall.So we all know Emma Watson is taller than Radcliffe.Emma is 5'6"...(she's not that tiny)
I'm willing to bet Emma is a bit shorter/same height as Daniel. Sure at the final Potter premieres last year she was taller but her heels were at least 3 1/2-4 inches high. Also I saw video of her taking her heels off once she entered the building at the NYC premiere she seemed to "shrink" a lot the second they came off. While I don't think she's 5'0 tiny I don't think she's 5'6 without heels either.
Daniel probably isn't 5'5" either, tbh. Emma seems really small, heightwise, when she isn't n heels. Probably around 5'3"? If anyone has met her in person, they'd know for sure.
Lol Dan Radcliffe is shorter than you think. He's 5'4 and no, Emma is not taller than him. My friend who's 5'4 saw her and said she was shorter than her. So yeah she's prolly around 5'2 to 5'4 max. And celebrities often lie about ther height (they add an inch or two).
5'2" would also be way too short for modeling. I would say Emma is between 5'5" and 5'6". She is taller than Dan even with flats and Dan on tip toes. No offense. I like Dan, but he is a handsom little man.
Emma is 5'5" tall with flats- Maybe even 5'6". I met her a couple of years ago and the top of her head came up to my eyes and, I am 5'8".
Good for her for getting movie roles, but I think she harped on the whole school thing a tad too much. I get it was a PR move, but no one would have judged her if she just said she wanted to do movies, model, do fashion, be famous, etc if she started it from the beginning after HP ended. I read that even though she dropped out again, she's still right on track with credits. How is this possible? Anyone know? Also, longer hair def looks better. They could have gotten a more realistic weave, though haha. Pretty girl regardless. Yes, she lost weight, but her weight fluctuates with what Hollywood things she's doing, just like most actresses.
To Daniel,
Emma got Advanced Placement credits for her perfect A-Levels. (She explained that once.) I would also continue to say, that when she took that summer Shakespeare course at RADA, she most likely got Drama credit for that summer. The way it usually goes that with AP credits and with RADA, she would go into college with at least 9 to 12 credits (most likely 12) 12 to 15 credits is considered a semester load. So in the 1st. Semester she most likely took 15 to 18 hours for the 1st semester and about 15 credits the 2nd semester, 15 credit the 3rd semester. So after the 3rd semester she most likely had about 60 credits. If Emma knew that she would possibly had to interupt her education, she probably took as many credits as possible during her freshman year when she wasn't under so much pressured. That would have given her a Junior standing up to her Oxford time. At Oxford she most likely collected some credit during the first two terms. Now she interupted Trinity term, which is actually independent study for research. The question is she doing any research or has she pushed the last term to next year.
I doubt she has senior standing if she doesn't do her research during Trinity. I think the JYA only counts if you complete all the terms, but there I have heard different, for there are students who only study abroad for a semester until the Christmas break and their credits count. I guess it is a matter how Brown chooses to evaluate what she has actually researched and what was evaluated from professors during her uni time. But she definately collected AP credtis from her A-levels, and I bet from RADA also. Students from USA study there for a year, and those credits are transferable. She did that course after A-Levels so it would be considered a college level course. And take it- she studied Shakespeare Text and performance at RADA.
But no way could she have a senior standing now. I think the JUnior standing is most likely.
Yes, RADA could count if she has similiar major like Drama and Literature, Acting- theatre.
At most Ivy League colleges, credit only counts towards courses that are applicable to ones major. This was the case at Yale, although Brown may be far more lenient. So if Emma is majoring in English (?) not all her A levels will count, therefore she should not, legally, be a semester ahead.
I guess that is clear. But would RADA count since it was a Shakespeare course. I have read that she is majoring in Drama (Literature) and History at Brown and did an English Literature stint at OXford. But since you can create your own major at brown itis most likely combined according to interest of study. She did do A-Levels (AP) in history and English.
^ No, weren't her A-levels in English, Geography and Art? She never did history at A-Level.
I thought she did history. Started with art in GSCs but had to drop it. She then did history and English if I remember correctly.
I correct that english, art history and geography.
Post a Comment