November 20, 2012

Emma Watson and Will in New York [18 November]

Source: EWD

50 comments:

Chris said...

I know it's not fair to judge from a 5 second window, but man does Will look upset.

Jonathan Andrew Sheen said...

Chris, don't you remember that blind gossip item? He's probably irritated because she corrected him on something!

Snerk!

Chris said...

Actually I don't, what was it?

CutiePie32 said...

if only i knew where in New York they were.........lol

Anonymous said...

Maybe she's texting Daniel or Rupert. . . or her brother Alex. . . or Helena Bonham Carter.
She recently said that after her previous relationships she never knew love could be easy; it was always difficult before. I can't imagine what it would be like being Emma Watson's BF, especially after he probably watched her grow up on screen as Hermione. At any rate, good luck.

Anonymous said...

It would take a real man to be with a celeb. Knowing majority of the time you'll be papped when they both go out. Will is doing a a real good job and i wish them both the best :)

Unknown said...

Well, oh dear about Emma's texting someone and didn't talk to her bf. I know Will is unhappy and upset about Emma's mobile phone. Hmmm...

coslopus said...

It looks like the paparazzi were with her for a couple of seconds, or at the most, minutes. These pics are all taken in the same location, which means they probably didn't follow her the whole time during her outing with Will. Maybe Emma just got a call for a text and was answering it for a few minutes, then spent the rest of the time focusing on Will.

Will could be upset because it seems that every time they go out, the paparazzi follow them. Emma could have just gotten a call, or maybe it's business. For The Daily Mail to say that Will is angry because Emma is ignoring him is just stupid.

In all the paparazzi pics we've seen of them walking about, this is the first time I've seen Will looking upset and Emma on her phone. I think people are looking too into this pic.

sparkvark111 said...

I kind of amazes me how people seem to think they what people must be feeling based on a few photos or video clips. I do not think people always conscientiously put on a particular expression while walking. I know I don't. They are not making any expressions different than anyone else walking down the street.

Anonymous said...

To me, Will just looks like he's cold. Emma probably spent only a couple of mins checking her phone which is perfectly normal, what's she supposed to do gaze at him permanently? They've been together over a year now so one can assume they're happy together.

Anonymous said...

He's obviously upset, he just just can't express how upset he really is inside to her. Just because she's a celebrity, so he can't be pictured yelling or anything like that by the paparazzi.

Eden said...

Why do I feel that some people are confusing paparazzi pictures and fotonovelas?

Anonymous said...

How are you guys even coming up with stuff with only 8 pictures?

Anonymous said...

Also it's 8 pictures taken in no more than a minute if they're walking at normal pace, it's the same bush in the background the whole time. This isn't photos following them along a street it's about 60 seconds of the walk!!

Leviathan's Phone said...

Chris, I was totally kidding, but there was a blind gossip item about a month ago that said the BF of a "foreign born" young actress was upset to discover she'd be staying in the USA after finishing a movie project, because he's sick of her, but doesn't want to be the bad guy and break up with her. The boyfriend has had it with the actress correcting him all the time on facts, grammar, table manners, etc. (There are other complaints, but they don't apply to walking down the street in NYC.)

http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2012/10/blind-item-1_22.html

Anonymous said...

Lol many people are sooo overreacting. These pictures were shot in about 10 seconds. Will doesn't look happy, but there isn't a couple in the entite world that always looks happy. Maybe they just had a fight or a big discussion. BIG DEAL...

°º©SIL©º° said...

I feel sick

Anonymous said...

This is no more ridiculous than when there are pictures of them smiling and people flood this place with comments with how "happy" and "in love" they are.

Those are also pictures taken over 10 seconds. People get upset when the assumes don't match what they want to believe.

Anonymous said...

*assumptions* - not assumes.

Anonymous said...

How tall is Will?? Any guesses?

Anonymous said...

About 6ft 1

Anonymous said...

he looks like 6ft2inch

Anonymous said...

if what that article says is true than she gave her goodies up to will.

Leviathan's Phone said...

I don't think there's any serious doubt about Emma, Will and her goodies -- She's a modern adult woman not known to adhere to any particularly restrictive code about such things -- but I wouldn't take the Blind Item all that seriously.

CutiePie32 said...

When we say "goodies" what are we really talking about?......

Jonathan Andrew Sheen said...

CutiePie32, I'd say, if you don't already have a good idea of that, we here aren't the ones to tell you.

Chris said...

@Leviathan Okay, thanks for clarifying that for me. I just read the blog you posted and personally don't buy any of it, like you said.

Anonymous said...

Levi- I can't believe Emma would try to correct an educated, intelligent young man how to eat his food, blow his nose, and correct his grammar- I might believe in with johnny simmons, but they are no longer together.

Anonymous said...

Even modern women don't give up all their goodies straight away. Until you get married, the the goodies have been so drained that there is hardly any left for the precise moment. Definately, all modern women don't think that Will has already gotten all the goodies

Anonymous said...

I've just found an article written by Will in which he talks about his education. And if we believe what he writes, his parents (esp his father) were quite strict with him about good manners, the way he spoke... when he was a little boy. So he's not the guy in the blind item

Anonymous said...

and he has no problem with his grammar

Anonymous said...

Are the article you talk about is the one he write in the heights, the independant boston journal?! Anyway I really don't think he would say such things he seem like a real gentlemen and real mature guy. I was really impress with his writing too...really talented and intelligent!

Anonymous said...

^ Where on earth is the link to this article/essay Will wrote?

Chris said...

I read the three articles from The Heights that you posted, not one of them does he even bring up his family or his upbringing. The first one was about how college doesn't really prepare you for the real world (but what was he really thinking with a philosophy degree), the second was about a crying girl and her relationship woes (someone in his dorm), and the third was about his love for food. And all three were extremely long winded, they all could have been cut by 1/3 and have the same results. And as far as that Gossip site, if there was any truth to it then why would it be on some random blog?

Anonymous said...

Emma said once when she was much younger, that she would choose a partner with whom she could speak with about intellectual matters- (didn't say it in these words but the meaning was clear). Remember Chris, Will is a philosophy student, who is used to analysis, which can be logical and long-winded, but I still thought that the articles were well written- matter of taste in style. But he is not the young man with bad manners and incorrect grammar.
I must sáy though, the man who is not of this celebrity world, and loves a celebrity, must be real tough. But it can work. Look at meryl streep and her artist husband.

Leviathan's Phone said...

Okay, to answer various posts....

As I've said repeatedly, even if that Blind Item is intended to be about Will and Emma -- which is not confirmed -- I don't take it very seriously. It sounds similar enough to be an amusing reference in a discussion of the deep unhappiness Will is showing being with Emma by not grinning like a loon for the three or four seconds the Pap was snapping.

Emma's been with Will as her full-time boyfriend through international travel and plenty of alone time for a year or more. If you choose to believe there's been no exchange of goodies, you can, but it's pretty unlikely. Contrary to statements by some, goodies aren't a finite, unrenewable resource. They don't get "drained." You can "give them up" twice a day, every day, and still be able to "give up your goodies" tomorrow. Whether you choose to or not is up to you, but it seems unlikely that after a year's serious involvement, Emma hasn't. By today's standards, it's not considered immoral or in any way unusual nor unacceptable.

Gossip sites, while hardly infallible, are frequently correct. "Crazy Days and Nights" is widely-read and well-established, and has a remarkably good "hit rate," with many of its items revealed to be true. Information flows to gossip sites in many ways, including through the boasting of non-famous people who are on the fringe of a situation being boastful of their "inside knowledge" of a potentially-juicy situation involving celebrities. So, as an example, while I don't particularly believe that piece was about Will and Emma, it would be typical that, if it were and if it were true, then one of Will's friends, to whom he'd talked about his relationship with Emma, might have leaked it, either to boast or even in hopes of cashing in, to a gossip writer. That mechanism is quite plausible.

I've read Will's articles and they have not impressed me as particularly insightful, nor as paragons of intellectual rigor -- nor, indeed, grammatical construction. They don't show a dullard, but neither do they display prodigy. They're fairly vapid, shallow pieces rehashing familiar tropes, like "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus." They offer nothing new and nothing original, and as published pieces, polished, edited and copy-edited, they're nothing like a reliable indicator of what direct, day-to-day interaction with him would be like. Speaking in person, Will Adamowicz may be the very model of grammatical exactitude, leaving no subjunctive clause out of place... But his published pieces are no evidence to that effect.

Anonymous said...

I was just wondering if any of you guys know what is the case her iPhone has. Is it from speck or some other brand?

Chris said...

One of my two majors was Broadcast Journalism and I was the assistant editor of my university paper for 3 years, that's why I am critical of his writing style.

Anonymous said...

I have also worked for uni newspapers which can be a yawn like a high school paper. If Will can truly write will not be seen at that level, that shows in independent, serious work. I know of a journalist, that wrote shit in college and is a respected journalist today, and an excellent writer.

Anonymous said...

no I'm talking about an essay from another publication in which he writes about Kant...

Anonymous said...

Can you post it? I would like to read it.

Anonymous said...

http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/cas_sites/philosophy/pdf/DIANOIA/Dianoia%20-%20Issue%20I.pdf

and at the end of the book there is a mini bio

Anonymous said...

the important is, that Emma and Will and share written or spoken literary and philosophical thoughts by candlelight. Maybe that is their type of goodie.

Anonymous said...

I like the article on beauty. Will shows a deep understanding of E. Kant and maybe follows his writing style after most likely having read him a lot. If you read Kant in German, his writing depicts long, precise sentences, most likely a part of the categorical imperative.
I think the article is very well written.Maybe a bit long winded.

Anonymous said...

German sentences tend to be long winded, so I bet it rubbed off after reading the _German philosopher.

Anonymous said...

I like the talking about lit and philosophy by candlelight.

Anonymous said...

OMG..all this talk about goodies lol. It's SEX ppl get over it. Sex is great! IMO it's 10 out of 10 on my fav things to do. You all make it sound like a chore or a gift. It's a way to bond physically, emotionaly and spirtually with a person your in love with. Why hold back if your in love! Marriage isn't all it's cracked up to be take it from someone who's been married for almost 20 years. Don't get me wrong I love my husband but marriage is a lot of hard work and don't let anyone tell you any different. If your in love then have sex and lots of it just use protection and be happy. :) I hope Emma and Will share "goodies" every chance they get. <3

Anonymous said...

Who said anything about sex. If they do it, it is their business.

Anonymous said...

I don't think either one of them would like us to discuss their goodies. Besides, Will is well mannered and a bit traditional, and so is Emma.

Anonymous said...

Will talks briefly about his upbringing as an example of beauty of ethics- (more or less) in his article about Kant in the Boston College philosophical periodical. The article is good. I wonder if he read the works of Kant in German. I have read Kant in Germany, and have also studied education after I had gotten my undergraduate and graduate degree in German and English in the USA. That article is well written. And if you you read philosophical works, they are all a bit long-winded for a mind unaccustomed to philosophical argument. I can truly únderstand why Emma would like such a young man with such a perception of beauty and where it belongs in life.