Une publication partagée par Emma Watson (@emmawatson) le
13 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Working? I got so exited to hear that word, I thought she was starring in a film or something, then I watch the video and got depressed again lol. Is almost March and by this point is pretty sure to say that this year and the next we are not getting a movie with her, I hope she saves her money! Hollywood offers don’t last forever!
"Is almost March and by this point is pretty sure to say that this year and the next we are not getting a movie with her, I hope she saves her money! Hollywood offers don’t last forever!"
It's estimated that she earned >30M$ for HP, so I'm more that sure she couldn't care less about making money anymore. Don't misunderstand, she still knows when work deserves a pay, she won't work for free, but she won't be looking for a money job.
That being said, I don't see why we should consider that she depends on Hollywood offers. She doesn't depend on anyone's will to give her a role, cause she's more than capable to start producing, directing, etc. She has connections, money... She can experience anything she wants and learn from that.
Thanks Eden for adding this post. Several minutes prior to, I pasted the link to Emma's last post instagram where this video was to find. However it sounds a bit weird to me: that she's working somewhere else right now and that's why she couldn't participate in Bafta, 'cause there are 2 photos of her to find on gettyimages (from yesterday, February the 17th): she took part in the "pre Bafta dinner at Marks club Mayfair", in London. I don't get it, to be honest...
Well, people forget that Hollywood is a business at the end of the day. If you can’t bring the big bucks they won’t hire you. Taylor Kitsch is a good example. The offers at some point stop. You should watch ‘Feud: Bette and Joan’ to inform yourself and see how Hollywood really works, that’s a pretty accuarate depiction. And if you think of all her flops like Colonia, The Circle and Regression, why would you hire her as a studio? I would rather bring Emma Stone, Jennifer Lawrence, Margot Robbie or Shailene Woodley to star, they are hit or miss, but at least they bring critical support and awards, not like EW who doesn’t have a lot of in this department. And you can bring the fact that Beauty was a big hit, because they would counter that it was the Disney brand, not Emma, and point out her flops. People remember the last they saw of you, and for her it was that awful movie the circle.
As you said, she could produce or write, etc. But she doesn’t seems interested in doing any of that either, I mean if she doesn’t like what she’s being paid or the roles that she is been offered why she hasn’t produce already? It can’t be because she’s young, Margot Robbie produce for herself I, Tonya and got an Oscar nom and she is the same age as Emma. I’m not a blind follower who supports everything she does, I used to be a relly big fan of hers during and the early post Harry Potter days, now I still like her but I’m so frustrated with her lack of focus and interest in her own career, If she doesn’t care why would I as her fan? You aren’t relevant forever, Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill never break out of Star Wars and I’m worried that it could happen the same to Emma, If she wants to be a role model, she could also be one by being successful at her work.
And also, the 30 mill of Harry Potter didn’t go all to her, she has to paid to her manager, her pr team, her glam team, her security, etc. Money doesn’t last forever. Joan Crawford and Bette Davis didn’t have a lot of when they were in their 50s. And Bette Davis was the highest paid actress of her time. Also look at Julia Roberts, her career isn’t what it used to! And she was the biggest star in the world. But you can still blindly support everything that she does like a sheep, you are in your right to do that.
Her boobs are a bit bigger yeah but she could have also gained weight.
"Why should she even be at the BAFTA? She is not foreseen for any award.Probably some kind of activism. " She wasnt up for any Golden Globes either and still went.
Haircut is awful. If you can make a woman with Emmas face look bad you need to reconsider your job.
13 comments:
Working? I got so exited to hear that word, I thought she was starring in a film or something, then I watch the video and got depressed again lol. Is almost March and by this point is pretty sure to say that this year and the next we are not getting a movie with her, I hope she saves her money! Hollywood offers don’t last forever!
"Is almost March and by this point is pretty sure to say that this year and the next we are not getting a movie with her, I hope she saves her money! Hollywood offers don’t last forever!"
It's estimated that she earned >30M$ for HP, so I'm more that sure she couldn't care less about making money anymore.
Don't misunderstand, she still knows when work deserves a pay, she won't work for free, but she won't be looking for a money job.
That being said, I don't see why we should consider that she depends on Hollywood offers. She doesn't depend on anyone's will to give her a role, cause she's more than capable to start producing, directing, etc. She has connections, money... She can experience anything she wants and learn from that.
Thanks Eden for adding this post.
Several minutes prior to, I pasted the link to Emma's last post instagram where this video was to find.
However it sounds a bit weird to me: that she's working somewhere else right now and that's why she couldn't participate in Bafta, 'cause there are 2 photos of her to find on gettyimages (from yesterday, February the 17th): she took part in the "pre Bafta dinner at Marks club Mayfair", in London.
I don't get it, to be honest...
https://www.gettyimages.ie/search/2/image?excludenudity=true&family=creative&license=rf&phrase=emma+watson&sort=best
It's not her on the pics.
Well, people forget that Hollywood is a business at the end of the day. If you can’t bring the big bucks they won’t hire you. Taylor Kitsch is a good example. The offers at some point stop. You should watch ‘Feud: Bette and Joan’ to inform yourself and see how Hollywood really works, that’s a pretty accuarate depiction. And if you think of all her flops like Colonia, The Circle and Regression, why would you hire her as a studio? I would rather bring Emma Stone, Jennifer Lawrence, Margot Robbie or Shailene Woodley to star, they are hit or miss, but at least they bring critical support and awards, not like EW who doesn’t have a lot of in this department. And you can bring the fact that Beauty was a big hit, because they would counter that it was the Disney brand, not Emma, and point out her flops. People remember the last they saw of you, and for her it was that awful movie the circle.
As you said, she could produce or write, etc. But she doesn’t seems interested in doing any of that either, I mean if she doesn’t like what she’s being paid or the roles that she is been offered why she hasn’t produce already? It can’t be because she’s young, Margot Robbie produce for herself I, Tonya and got an Oscar nom and she is the same age as Emma.
I’m not a blind follower who supports everything she does, I used to be a relly big fan of hers during and the early post Harry Potter days, now I still like her but I’m so frustrated with her lack of focus and interest in her own career, If she doesn’t care why would I as her fan? You aren’t relevant forever, Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill never break out of Star Wars and I’m worried that it could happen the same to Emma, If she wants to be a role model, she could also be one by being successful at her work.
And also, the 30 mill of Harry Potter didn’t go all to her, she has to paid to her manager, her pr team, her glam team, her security, etc. Money doesn’t last forever. Joan Crawford and Bette Davis didn’t have a lot of when they were in their 50s. And Bette Davis was the highest paid actress of her time. Also look at Julia Roberts, her career isn’t what it used to! And she was the biggest star in the world.
But you can still blindly support everything that she does like a sheep, you are in your right to do that.
Ehhhh. “Work” could mean anything at this point. I don’t even want to bother getting my hopes up at this point, lol.
What else is she goging to say? I'd rather die than set my foot on english ground ever again? I prefer the states over my homecountry?
Why should she even be at the BAFTA? She is not foreseen for any award.Probably some kind of activism.
boob job? :o
Her boobs are a bit bigger yeah but she could have also gained weight.
"Why should she even be at the BAFTA? She is not foreseen for any award.Probably some kind of activism. "
She wasnt up for any Golden Globes either and still went.
Haircut is awful. If you can make a woman with Emmas face look bad you need to reconsider your job.
It's more than strange that such a prestigious agency like getty made such a mistake...
https://www.gettyimages.ie/search/2/image?excludenudity=true&family=creative&license=rf&phrase=emma+watson&sort=best
the haircut makes her face look funny.
so Emma any updates on the gender less awards from last year?
This time next year neither she or the others will be talking about 'times up' they will be going on about the next in thing to care about.....
I even bet Harvey will escape any prosecution. Its all smoke and mirrors.
Post a Comment